Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Position: Medical AI Neglects Real Treatment Outcomes

Medical AI has rapidly improved its ability to perform diagnostic and prognostic tasks that lead to treatment decisions. But understanding of treatment itself is still inadequately trained and evaluated, using human opinions and syntheses (especially texts such as biomedical publications and clinical practice guidelines) rather than actual underlying data on treatment outcomes. This neglect seriously limits the potential of medical AI, and is already causing deficiencies in both frontier models and major benchmarks, as argued in this position paper. Real treatment outcomes, drawn from sources such as observational databases and randomized experiments, should be substantially incorporated ...

AuthorsShiva Kaul, Anjum Khurshid
Primary categorycs.AI
Published28 June 2026
Last updated at source28 June 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/765c298d-a7a1-44bd-8d59-44ec2132658d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.