Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Repair, Not Improvement: Decomposing Constrained Decoding in Tool-Call Abstention

A tool-calling router has to pick the right tool when one applies and decline when none does. Restricting the decoder to a grammar over the tool names is the standard remedy for the first, and on small models it buys a large accuracy gain. Recent work separates the loss caused by asking for a format from the loss caused by enforcing it at decode time. The second is small, which made enforcement look nearly free. The same work declines to extend that to function calling, where a constraint decides which answers exist rather than how one is written. Declining to call anything is the answer it most easily removes, and the one a router can least afford to lose. A grammar decides which tokens ...

AuthorsJanghoon Lee
Primary categorycs.CL
Published14 August 2026
Last updated at source5 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cc3276ad-e505-42c2-ad33-149d01648860" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.