Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Follow the Norm: Accounting for Fine-Tuning and Prompt Effects on Model Rationales

Normative datasets are often used to train and align AI systems, but the norms they contain can function as action-guiding patterns rather than neutral moral knowledge. We propose treating the AI system as a proxy actor and test whether dataset-level norms can shift it away from its baseline safety behavior when it faces high-conflict dilemmas. We make three contributions. First, we demonstrate in controlled experiments that norm-breaking fine-tuning yields norm-divergent actions justified by self-interested rationales, suggesting a systematic shift in patterns of justification. Second, we establish a practical audit trail linking downstream justifications to upstream norms using mixed me...

AuthorsLong Hoang Nguyen, Brice Valentin Kok-Shun, Guangyu Du et al.
Primary categorycs.CY
Published13 August 2026
Last updated at source13 August 2026
cs.CYcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/82fb17f3-b2e5-4bce-835c-5cecdbc764cb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.