Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Memorization Diagnostics for Code LLMs Should be Scale-Aware

The extent to which large language models for code rely on memorization over genuine understanding remains highly debated. While current literature frequently reports widespread memorization, evaluating the underlying probing techniques across dense architectures reveals a severe breakdown in their utility at scale. Traditional encoder-style probes using perturbations such as synonym fuzzing or dead-code insertion struggle to expose memorization in scaled models, even on known-contaminated benchmarks, and decoder-style probes that rely on log probabilities show similar performance degradation. The specific mode of failure for these probes, particularly why such techniques disrupt smaller ...

AuthorsPrateek Kumar Rajput, Abdoul Aziz Bonkoungou, Alberick Euraste Djiré et al.
Primary categorycs.SE
Published13 August 2026
Last updated at source13 August 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7f5be15e-6035-4c22-8243-0f8563e315b5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.