Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Is Per-Agent Policy Composition Safe? Rethinking Successor-Feature Transfer in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Many reinforcement learning systems, from fleet management to traffic signal control, must serve an objective that changes dynamically after deployment, and retraining a policy for each new objective is prohibitively expensive. For a single agent, this problem is well understood: successor features with generalized policy improvement, together with their universal extension, recombine a library of learned policies into a policy for any new objective, with a guarantee that the result is never worse than any policy in the library. However, multi-agent transfer has received far less attention, and the common practice of letting each agent recombine its own library independently inherits the ...

AuthorsZijian Zhao, Sen Li
Primary categorycs.LG
Published12 August 2026
Last updated at source12 August 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.MA
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a0f8cf5a-5f35-4cae-adad-cf90ebb4be98" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.