Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Decodable but Not Accessible: Auditing Distance-Based Reliability Estimation on Disentangled Skin-Lesion Representations

Distance-based reliability estimation assumes that a representation's geometry reflects its trustworthiness, yet this assumption is rarely tested under training interventions that reshape geometry directly. We audit this assumption under domain-adversarial representation learning using a disentanglement dose-response ladder. Three checkpoint families share the same architecture and a 16-dimensional representation, differing only in orthogonality strength (lambda = 0, 1, 5). Representation geometry changed substantially with disentanglement strength: the condition number shifted by two orders of magnitude (Kendall tau = 0.84, exact p = 2.8e-5). This change was not accompanied by improved r...

AuthorsDuc-Vinh Tran
Primary categoryeess.IV
Published10 August 2026
Last updated at source10 August 2026
eess.IVcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b34d4e52-117a-45af-8d5b-67d9b1f040ce" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.