Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

From Benchmark Performance to Tool Deployment: Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection

Automated anomaly detection methods often report strong performance on curated academic benchmarks, but their behavior under real-world industrial conditions is less clear. In this work, we evaluate 19 unsupervised anomaly detection models on the BowTie dataset, a challenging manufacturing dataset with reflective surfaces, subtle defects, and profile-specific variation. In contrast to benchmark results, we observe that model performance is less stable than typically reported on standard benchmarks such as MVTec AD, highly sensitive to preprocessing, and inconsistent across conditions, with no single approach emerging as uniformly robust; a consensus audit further indicates that nominal-da...

AuthorsMike Szklarzewski, CJ George, Gavin Smithson et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published7 August 2026
Last updated at source7 August 2026
cs.LGcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b2a46552-1361-4f7a-8043-b115c0a07340" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.