Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Representation Matters in Longitudinal Affective Computing

Longitudinal, in-the-wild, wearable sensing yields day-level physiology, sleep, activity, and environmental streams, whereas affect and cognition are labeled only episodically (per waves). We recast this cadence mismatch as a temporal representation problem and compare three wave-level mappings from dense histories to sparse labels: levels (within-wave summaries), absolute drift (change across waves), and proportional drift. Using almost a year of data from 82 adults in the Providemus alz study, we model 21 affect and cognition outcomes. Day-scale signals are reduced to compact wave-level descriptors (central tendency, dispersion, and distributional shape) and learned with four regressors...

AuthorsIgor Matias, Maximilian Haas, Eric J. Daza et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published2 July 2026
Last updated at source2 July 2026
cs.HCcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/864cd558-10e1-41e0-a9eb-fb9d025779b2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.