Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Capacity Confounds and Coverage Guarantees in Adaptive Sub-model Federated Learning

Sub-model federated learning lets resource-constrained clients train width-reduced versions of a global model, but existing methods allocate capacity by device resources alone. A natural next step, allocating capacity by each client's data heterogeneity as estimated from the updates the server already observes, is suggested by recent methods that size sub-models from training-derived signals. We ask whether that step is possible, using HAS-FL, an adaptive capacity-allocation framework, as a test case. First, validated against ground-truth label-distribution divergence on reproducible partitions, update-divergence estimates of client heterogeneity are dominated by capacity rather than data...

AuthorsAlireza Moayedikia
Primary categorycs.LG
Published7 August 2026
Last updated at source8 October 2026
cs.LGcs.DC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fc7ff1ad-8394-47e1-9169-f30f9b68d7c3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.