Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Reducing belief in conspiracy theories as they unfold using large language models

The emergence of conspiracy theories in the wake of major events is a significant societal challenge. Here we test whether conversational dialogues with a large language model (LLM) can reduce belief in immediately unfolding conspiracies. In experiments conducted in the days following the July 2024 assassination attempt on Donald Trump and the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk, U.S. adults (Experiment 1: N = 472; Experiment 2: N = 1035) holding conspiratorial views about the crisis event engaged in a multi-turn conversation with an LLM prompted to reduce their conspiracy belief. Compared to control participants who either discussed an irrelevant topic with an LLM or viewed a st...

AuthorsThomas H. Costello, Nathaniel Rabb, Michael Nicholas Stagnaro et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published6 August 2026
Last updated at source6 August 2026
cs.HCcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9b7bacd1-0a0f-4686-9aee-f631fe6a15ff" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.