Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Ground-Truth Framework for Uncertainty Disentanglement with Posterior Risk

Reliable uncertainty estimates are critical in safety-sensitive applications. For such estimates to be useful in practice, it is crucial to understand the sources underlying a model's uncertainty, motivating the disentanglement of total uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. Existing notions of uncertainty differ in the sources they capture and, consequently, in their definitions of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, with no universally accepted definition. We define uncertainty through sample-conditional pointwise posterior risk, which is the expected loss of a predictor under the distribution of plausible ground-truth functions given the observed sample. This definition...

AuthorsFrieder Wizgall, Georg Tirpitz, Moritz Seiler et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published6 August 2026
Last updated at source1 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a88558f0-b510-4082-8b8e-5c2e744ab8d0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.