Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Mitigating Scoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge via Random Number Generation

Large Language Models (LLMs) are often used as evaluators of text quality, known as LLM-as-a-Judge, which can outperform conventional automatic evaluation metrics that rely on reference texts. However, LLM evaluators tend to generate particular scores regardless of the context of the evaluated text, which is known as scoring bias. This study proposes a novel method to mitigate this scoring bias. An LLM is instructed to randomly generate number tokens, and the latent numerical bias of the LLM is identified by measuring the deviation of the observed distribution of numbers from the uniform distribution. A definition of a downstream task, for which an LLM evaluator is used, is added to the p...

AuthorsYuma Asato, Kiyoaki Shirai, Natthawut Kertkeidkachorn
Primary categorycs.CL
Published6 August 2026
Last updated at source6 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ecf36aa4-a773-4e2e-a087-17de9b5daca8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.