Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Where Privacy Risk Lives in English-Source Multilingual RAG: A Stage-Decomposed Audit Across Five Query Languages

A common assumption holds that switching to a non-English language makes a multilingual RAG system easier to attack for personal information. We test this on an English-source synthetic-PII corpus with five query languages and a two-stage defence (LLM input judge + regex output filter), in a pipeline whose translator, judge, back-translator, and generator are all Qwen2.5-7B -- so every finding below is pipeline-conditional, not a causal ranking of language-inherent risk. Under output-only filtering, English has the highest observed unstructured-PII leak rate; only English-vs-Swahili separates cleanly under document-level bootstrap intervals. Once the input judge is added, residual leaks r...

AuthorsYanhang Li, Zhichao Fan, Zexin Zhuang
Primary categorycs.CL
Published26 May 2026
Last updated at source26 May 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/deeb4a22-e1aa-41a6-a969-7101cc77c3f2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.