Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Recompute or Reuse? Diagnosing and Mitigating Textual Shortcuts in VLM Self-Reflection

Vision-language models (VLMs) are expected to revise their reasoning when visual evidence changes. Failures to do so are often attributed to insufficient visual attention or contextual inertia, leaving unclear what models reuse instead of recomputing from the current image. We show that evidence-bearing reasoning in a prior chain of thought (CoT) can form a textual shortcut that competes behaviorally with visual recomputation. Across 16 VLMs, a matched counterfactual analysis identifies evidence-bearing content as the most robust carrier of prior-CoT influence. Removing this evidence-bearing content shifts answer preference more than removing length-matched non-evidence context or the fin...

AuthorsWenxiao Fan, Jingling Fu, Fang Li et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published3 August 2026
Last updated at source3 August 2026
cs.CVcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c4f5c5f7-743f-4425-b971-a1c69f548759" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.