Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Toward Plasticity-Preserving KL Regularization for Capability Retention in LLM Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central paradigm for large language model (LLM) post-training, but optimization toward new objectives can degrade capabilities already present in the base model. KL regularization is widely used to mitigate such forgetting by constraining policy drift toward a reference model. However, standard full-policy KL regularization constrains the entire response distribution and may unnecessarily restrict exploration and target-task learning. This raises a natural question: can a more precise constraint preserve existing capabilities while minimizing interference with learning new tasks? To this end, we propose \underline{Co}rrectness-Conditioned \underlin...

AuthorsLi Wang, Xiaodong Lu, Xiaohan Wang et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published3 August 2026
Last updated at source3 August 2026
cs.LGcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9a256c55-5f20-4f14-9370-9c2e9e3696e6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.