Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Loanword or Switch? The Annotation Boundary, Not the Model, Drives Kazakh-Russian Code-Switching Identification

Off-the-shelf LID and letter heuristics over-label Kazakh-Russian social text as mixed: Russian loanwords inside Kazakh look like code-switching under a shared Cyrillic script. We release a document-level gold LID set whose guideline keeps integrated borrowings as Kazakh and reserves mixed for clause-level switches, plus a mixed-only sentiment pool used after LID in a filter-first cascade. On a shared LID test, FastText, Lingua, raw and windowed HeLI, character-trigram NB, and XLM-R range from weak to strong performance. The gap shows the bottleneck is the loanword-vs-switch annotation boundary, not model class alone.

AuthorsBogdan Savelyev
Primary categorycs.CL
Published1 August 2026
Last updated at source1 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b65a7918-c73c-43b2-b5ff-fa3c32db2d30" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.