Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

CurveShift: Is Agent Progress Scalar? Separating Level from Shape

Progress in large language models is often summarized using a single scalar measure, such as a time horizon, a latent ability estimate, or an aggregate benchmark score. These summaries capture the overall performance, but they do not test whether progress is distributed differently across task difficulty. We find that most of the apparent shift in gains toward harder tasks does not reflect a change in the shape of the difficulty-response curve. On METR time-horizon data, a single Rasch model with rising ability reproduces this pattern, so it is largely explained by ceiling effects rather than a qualitative change in capability. This echoes how the choice of metric can make claimed emergen...

AuthorsHanwen Xing, Pengyun Wang, BingXu Meng et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published31 July 2026
Last updated at source31 July 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/891f6a44-3e54-48bd-bb60-ea2728cad3cc" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.