Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A robust association between LLM use and scientific productivity: Assessing stopping-time selection

Renault, Bergeaud, and Bosquet (hereafter RBB) argue that dating LLM adoption as the first month in which an author's abstract is flagged induces a stopping-time selection that can produce a positive event-study path even when there is no causal effect. Although this mechanism is mathematically possible, it does not constitute proof of a null effect. Recalibrating RBB's own random placebo to the detector's realized flag rate, we show that the measured association stays well above this benchmark, so the artifact is too small to explain the productivity changes. We further re-estimate the association between LLM adoption and productivity with a series of complementary designs in which the t...

AuthorsKeigo Kusumegi, Xinyu Yang, Paul Ginsparg et al.
Primary categorycs.DL
Published31 July 2026
Last updated at source31 July 2026
cs.DLcs.AIcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fdbdfd90-c826-478f-ba76-0a0701f5a0da" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.