Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

How Hard Does It Think? Analyzing Step-Aware Reasoning Energy in LLM Chain-of-Thought Trajectories

Understanding how computational effort is allocated across individual chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning steps remains an open challenge: existing interpretability methods rely on output-level signals or collapse processing depth into a single trajectory-level scalar, leaving step-wise effort opaque. We propose Step-Aware Reasoning Energy (SARE), a geometric framework that quantifies effort at the granularity of individual CoT steps via Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) between Gram matrices of token hidden states across adjacent transformer layers, capturing inter-token relational structure without requiring eigenvector alignment or cluster correspondence. SARE further contextualizes this en...

AuthorsHui Wei, Junda Wu, Sheldon Yu et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published28 July 2026
Last updated at source28 July 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a1e76fe8-4902-47ec-8a78-829403f8dcc0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.