Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Measuring Alignment With Reader Highlights Net of Position and Length

Context compression discards most of a document before a language model reads it, and is normally evaluated by downstream task accuracy - which makes another model the judge of what mattered. Naturalistic social highlighting offers a non-circular reference: many people independently marking passages on the same page. But the obvious metric, the fraction of crowd-marked sentences a compressor keeps, is confounded twice: crowd marks are front-loaded and crowd-marked sentences are longer, so any method favouring early or long sentences scores well regardless of readers. We remove both by matching each marked sentence against unmarked sentences of the same document at equal relative depth and...

AuthorsKazuki Nakayashiki, Keisuke Watanabe
Primary categorycs.IR
Published30 July 2026
Last updated at source30 July 2026
cs.IRcs.CLcs.HC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8a32d107-b830-43d1-87a1-083a8662aab3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.