Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Beyond Similarity: Grounded Agentic Extraction and Expert-Adjudicated Evaluation of Intertextuality in Classical Chinese Histories

Computational approaches to intertextuality have advanced from string matching to neural retrieval, yet their outputs, similarity scores and parallel-passage lists, identify where texts reuse one another without characterizing how or why. We recast fine-grained intertextuality extraction as an agentic task in which a large language model (LLM) reads two text units in full and, through a constrained tool interface, must ground each proposed reuse in exact character spans on both sides and label it under a five-dimension typology of reuse (form, aspect, source-marking, function, stance). We validate the approach on an exhaustive comparison of the Analects with the Book of Han, where three d...

AuthorsZhaoji Wang, Wanyu Si, Jun Wang
Primary categorycs.CL
Published30 July 2026
Last updated at source30 July 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.DL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8fd79579-5a23-422f-9965-204ccad222fe" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.