Is Solving Better Than Evaluating GenAI Solutions?
As Generative AI (GenAI) tools become increasingly capable of generating solutions to computing assignments, the computing education community is exploring pedagogical approaches that emphasize solution evaluation, verification, and critique alongside traditional solution generation. However, evidence regarding the impact of such evaluation-centered tasks on student learning remains limited, particularly in upper-division, theory-heavy courses. We conducted a randomized A/B crossover study (N=220) in a junior-level algorithms course to compare evaluating GenAI-generated solutions with traditional problem solving. Across six assignments, student working groups either solved challenging alg...
| Authors | Ethan Dickey, Marios Mertzanidis, Alexandros Psomas |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CY |
| Published | 30 July 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 30 July 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.