Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

More Data, Worse Decisions? Preference Reversals in Neural Networks under Gram Incompatibility

Neural networks increasingly combine data across populations, time periods, and operating conditions to improve generalization. This raises a reliability question: whether a model refitted on pooled data preserves an action ordering supported by both sources. Case-Based Decision Theory (CBDT) formalizes this requirement through its composition axiom, which requires source-supported preferences to survive their union. We study when this property holds for fixed-representation neural networks with ordinary least squares (OLS) output heads. First, we show that pooled refitting recomputes the inverse-Gram geometry used to weight source evidence, which can reverse shared preferences, and deriv...

AuthorsYanli Yan, Yuanzheng Li, Yong Zhao et al.
Primary categorystat.ML
Published28 July 2026
Last updated at source28 July 2026
stat.MLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7114f7c0-b4e6-4877-85e6-2cdf662ef900" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.