Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Human Utility Factor: A Computable Welfare Metric That Reframes AI Governance as a Constrained Optimisation Problem

Existing AI governance frameworks, including the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF, address safety, transparency, and accountability but do not operationalize quantitative constraints on macro-socioeconomic stability. As a result, AI systems may satisfy regulatory requirements while contributing to labor displacement, rising inequality, and reduced economic resilience. We introduce the Human Utility Factor (HUF), a differentiable welfare metric that models the interaction between Agency, Wellbeing, and Economic Stability as functions of three actionable policy levers: automation depth, redistribution intensity, and employment coverage. HUF yields a closed-form optimal automation level and a minim...

AuthorsSivasathivel Kandasamy
Primary categoryecon.GN
Published23 June 2026
Last updated at source23 June 2026
econ.GNcs.AIcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bb48fbfc-872e-410e-b135-20eafc31f56c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.