Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Falling Behind Drives Unsafe Development in an Idealised AI Race Experiment

Technological races create tension between speed and safety: actors may gain by moving faster than competitors, even when risky development is harmful. This is prominent in debates about artificial intelligence (AI), where competitive pressure is often argued to incentivise riskier, less safety-conscious development. We study this using a framed behavioural experiment based on an idealised AI race, in which paired participants repeatedly chose between Safe and Unsafe development under an uncertain time horizon. Unsafe development gave faster progress and higher immediate payoffs but accumulated private risk up to a treatment-specific maximum of 10\%, 60\%, or 90\%; the race's competitive ...

AuthorsElias Fernández Domingos, The Anh Han
Primary categorycs.AI
Published28 July 2026
Last updated at source28 July 2026
cs.AIcs.CYcs.GTecon.GN
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/765f5218-26d0-46af-a5e6-b05ee93d4c63" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.