Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

To Erase, or Not to Erase: Robust Training-Free Concept Erasure with Preservation aware Adaptive Ranked Subspace Expansion

Concept erasure techniques (CETs) edit text-to-image diffusion models to erase undesired targets such as NSFW content or copyrighted styles, while preserving model utility on benign concepts. Current CETs face a trade-off between erasure robustness and utility: stronger edits erase the target more reliably but degrade utility on non-target concepts, and vice versa. This stems from how existing methods define what to erase and what to preserve. Many CETs rely on static concept banks specified manually, generated by LLMs, or selected by CLIP image-text similarity. Such banks do not model how prompts steer the model during denoising, leaving it vulnerable to triggers that reintroduce the tar...

AuthorsShaswati Saha, Rajasekhar Anguluri, Manas Gaur
Primary categorycs.CV
Published26 July 2026
Last updated at source4 September 2026
cs.CVcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/714b6fc3-fa2b-41cc-a03d-afe6513fcbdb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.