Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Agentic Autoresearch for CT Reconstruction

Comparing CT reconstruction methods fairly is labor-intensive and largely manual, and many benchmarks use idealized data. We ask whether a large language model (LLM) agent can do the labor of reconstruction research on its own, and whether a ranking measured on ideal data predicts behavior under realistic noise. We built an agentic loop: the agent edits a solver, runs a short cluster job, reads one frozen metric, and revises. The metric is a calibrated headroom score against the FBP baseline, inside the field of view; every method shares the same differentiable fan-beam projector. We benchmarked 26 methods on Mayo low-dose CT (noise-limited) and a 128-view sparse-view breast task from the...

AuthorsAndreas Maier, Lucas Kachelriess, Siming Bayer et al.
Primary categoryphysics.med-ph
Published24 July 2026
Last updated at source24 July 2026
physics.med-phcs.AIcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8e41024d-57e6-4b61-8a2f-a54878627330" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.