Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Benchmarking Text-to-SQL under Role-Based Access Control

Given a database S and a natural language question Q, text-to-SQL systems aim to generate an SQL query that correctly answers Q when executed against S. Currently, popular text-to-SQL benchmarks mostly assume unrestricted access to S; in practice, however, user access is often restricted, e.g., through role-based access control (RBAC) policies. This leads to a potential disconnect between benchmarking results and real-world performance: an LLM with high benchmark scores might perform poorly in an access-controlled environment, by frequently violating RBAC, or rejecting a query q that could be answered with only permitted data in S. Motivated by this, we present a comprehensive text-to-SQL...

AuthorsYang Fei, Yangfan Jiang, Yin Yang et al.
Primary categorycs.DB
Published24 July 2026
Last updated at source22 September 2026
cs.DBcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d4d69893-858f-48b1-ac63-726afb93b9e2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.