Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Does Knowledge Distillation Hurt? Reliability-Aware Distillation for Low-Resource Language Summarization

Knowledge distillation (KD) is a standard approach for compressing sequence-to-sequence models, but its per-sample effects are rarely examined. On the BanSum Bangla summarization benchmark, we find that standard KD improves ROUGE-L by only +0.0003 over a cross-entropy baseline, and that approximately 51.3% of training samples are estimated to actively harm student validation loss under standard KD. We propose two complementary reliability-aware distillation methods. CHAD (Counterfactual Harm-Aware Distillation) measures per-sample KD usefulness via gradient alignment with the validation loss direction and trains a lightweight gate that generalizes this counterfactual judgment to the full ...

AuthorsDipto Sumit, Ankan Kumar Roy Srizon, Sadia Khair Rodela et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published22 July 2026
Last updated at source22 July 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e4dd7059-7d7f-4b60-b79a-4b7d4cda8890" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.