Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rewarding Better Thinking for LLM Preference Alignment

LLM preference alignment aims to optimize models toward human preferences across diverse user instructions. Reinforcement learning has become a major post-training approach for this goal, but existing proxy rewards are often outcome-level, mainly evaluating the final response while providing limited guidance for the reasoning trajectory. This can make credit assignment coarse when multiple responses receive similar final scores, leaving trajectory-level preferences under-specified. To address this limitation, we propose Thinking Checklist Reward (TCR), a process-oriented reward for RL-based preference alignment. TCR converts preference pairs into sample-specific thinking checklists and us...

AuthorsXubo Liu, Wenya Guo, Ruxue Yan et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published22 July 2026
Last updated at source22 July 2026
cs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8d5797de-35bc-42d2-ab7e-30f230f6b60d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.