Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Silent Failures in Multimodal Agentic Search:A Diagnostic Taxonomy and Cross-Judge Evaluation

Multimodal agentic search systems increasingly rely on external tools to answer knowledge-intensive visual questions. However, existing evaluations mainly focus on final-answer accuracy and may miss failures in the search trajectory. In this work, we study such hidden reliability issues as silent failures. We introduce a six-category taxonomy covering modality shortcuts, phantom grounding, wrong-evidence-right-answer cases, over-retrieval laundering, cross-modal contradiction, and provenance hallucination. Based on this taxonomy, we build a trajectory-level diagnostic pipeline that evaluates both answer correctness and evidence-grounding quality under a unified ReAct-style scaffold. Exper...

AuthorsZhengxian Wu, Junjie Gao, Kai Yang
Primary categorycs.AI
Published22 July 2026
Last updated at source22 July 2026
cs.AIcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b15a2ca9-0ee8-4a99-9c54-abe7b67c4ca1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.