Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Decodable but Not Detectable: A Leakage Fingerprint for Near-OOD Benchmarks

While auditing a perturbation-based OOD detector on a document benchmark, we recorded an AUROC of 0.326 -- well below the 0.5 chance level. The cause is a benchmark leak: the designated "OOD" class is one the model was trained on, so its examples sit inside the in-distribution fit set and the detector is penalized for correctly ranking them as familiar. Deleting the class and retraining 35 models across two domains raises the score to 0.911. We distill the contamination into a leak fingerprint -- near-perfect supervised decodability (AUROC approximately 1) coupled with unsupervised detection collapsed below 0.65 -- and validate it on a controlled battery of 52 settings (20 leaked, 32 clea...

AuthorsVishnu Bindu Balachandran
Primary categorycs.LG
Published2 July 2026
Last updated at source2 July 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/78e15dc7-f9bc-48ed-bfec-86e73e34f723" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.