Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Competitive and Complementary Tools

Humans have always externalized thought onto tools, from the tally and the abacus to the map and, now, large language models. I model the agent, the tool, and the task as one dynamical system in which competence (what the user retains) and reliance (what the user outsources) co-evolve, and find that the outcome is bistable. Above a critical tool availability the competent state is destroyed and competence collapses toward a low dependent floor as the user outsources completely. Lowering availability does not reverse the collapse until a far lower threshold, so history of practice rather than the current tool fixes the state. Two users with the same present access can therefore occupy oppo...

AuthorsDavid C. Krakauer
Primary categoryq-bio.NC
Published20 July 2026
Last updated at source20 July 2026
q-bio.NCcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ceab0de8-5dfd-4c88-ba96-bc1d330a3b59" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.