Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning Who to Treat When Treatment is Missing

Policy learning methods are increasingly used to inform treatment allocation under budget constraints. Most proposed methods assume complete treatment data, yet applications frequently suffer from missingness that can bias estimates and lead to suboptimal policies. We address this gap by extending efficient estimators for average treatment effect (ATE) estimation to policy value and conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation under missing at random (MAR) and missing completely conditionally at random (MCCAR) treatment data. Through asymptotic efficiency analysis, we prove that the MAR estimator, which leverages partially-observed units, is both valid and more efficient than th...

AuthorsJohnna Sundberg, Rayid Ghani, Eli Ben-Michael et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 July 2026
Last updated at source15 July 2026
cs.LGstat.ME
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fd7396d4-9cf2-4bee-8b0b-8dc7fdcdcc6a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.