Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Operationalising Multi-Dimensional Evaluation for Conversational Agents: A Scalable, Governed Pipeline with Selective Re-evaluation and Model Benchmarking

Evaluating retail conversational agents requires methods beyond lexical-overlap metrics to assess intent alignment, factuality, helpfulness, clarity, tone, and overall response quality. Although LLM-as-a-judge methods provide scalable alternatives to human evaluation, production deployment introduces challenges in governance, reproducibility, cost, schema consistency, traceability, and reliability. We present GenAI Evaluation, a governed, configuration-driven pipeline for large-scale evaluation of retail conversational systems. It processes production chatbot logs through normalization, sharding, asynchronous execution, and schema-constrained LLM scoring. The framework evaluates helpfulne...

AuthorsNiranjan Kumar M, Balaji Nagarajan, Karthik Nair et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published13 July 2026
Last updated at source13 July 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7f54f9ac-98ad-4b02-8e31-95e85f0b0587" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.