Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Diversifying to Verify: When Task-Equivalent Programs Differ in Verifiability

Program verification is crucial for software correctness, but producing fully verified programs remains difficult in practice. This paper studies whether implementation structure affects automated verifiability when multiple generated programs are intended to satisfy the same task-level semantics. We present Diversify2Verify, a staged LLM-based pipeline for Why3 that infers representation-specific contracts, generates and tests diverse recursive and imperative array/list implementations, and attempts verification with bounded verifier-guided annotation repair. We also construct a verification-oriented benchmark of 73 tasks over integers, arrays, and lists, yielding 292 implementation vari...

AuthorsShirley Yu, Ruben Martins
Primary categorycs.SE
Published10 July 2026
Last updated at source10 July 2026
cs.SEcs.AIcs.LO
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d474f706-d533-442b-a461-514b1146455f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.