Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench: Testing the Limits of Agents on Long-Horizon Terminal Tasks with Dense Reward-Based Grading
AI agents have become capable of autonomously completing short, well-specified tasks. However, existing terminal benchmarks largely focus on simple problems that finish within minutes and are evaluated only by their final outcome. This setup overlooks intermediate progress and partial solutions, yielding sparse reward signals and an incomplete picture of agent capability. We introduce Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench, a terminal benchmark of 46 long-horizon tasks spanning nine categories, including experiment reproduction, software engineering, multimodal analysis, interactive games, and scientific computing. Each task follows a Terminal-Bench-style setup with a reference solution or simulatio...
| Authors | Zongxia Li, Zhongzhi Li, Yucheng Shi et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.AI |
| Published | 9 July 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 9 October 2026 |
Models and datasets referencing this paper
- IntelligenceLab/Long-Horizon-Terminal-BenchDataset
- IntelligenceLab/LHTB-leaderboardDataset
- AgentNativeResearchLab/lhtb-gemini3.1-pro-high-trajectoriesDataset
- AgentNativeResearchLab/lhtb-grok4.5-trajectoriesDataset
- AgentNativeResearchLab/lhtb-glm5.2-trajectoriesDataset
- AgentNativeResearchLab/lhtb-kimi-k3-trajectoriesDataset
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.