Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Optimizing Against Safety Representations: Activation-Guided Adversarial Suffixes and the Geometry of Refusal

Behavioral alignment in large language models often masks fragile internal safety representations. Recent work suggests that refusal behavior is mediated by low-dimensional directions in activation space. This raises questions about how such representations are structured, localized, and accessed by optimization. We study adversarial suffix attacks as a probe of representational alignment. We introduce Activation-Guided GCG, which replaces output-based objectives with losses that directly target a model's internal refusal direction. Across several objective variants, we find that suppressing refusal globally across all layers and positions is more effective than targeting a single layer-p...

AuthorsEge Çakar, Hannah Guan, Kayden Kehe
Primary categorycs.LG
Published9 July 2026
Last updated at source9 July 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/df8da130-6189-4e83-8c34-bb17ac7c93d6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.