Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Top-K Misses the Decision: Tool-Call Drift in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

Top-$K$ teacher logits make on-policy distillation tractable, but retained teacher mass does not certify student-relative gradient fidelity. We study routed, two-teacher tool-use distillation. In a frozen Qwen3.5-9B audit, the tool teacher ranks the entry token first on 500 tool prompts, and top-32 reinforces it in every matched pair. The response teacher's top-32 instead retains 99.99\% mass yet contains the same token on only 0.4\% of 500 response prompts; student-aware support restores the coordinate in all matched pairs and nearly matches full-vocabulary descent. On the tool route, top-32 preserves the reinforcing direction but substantially attenuates its full-vocabulary magnitude de...

AuthorsJiabin Shen, Guang Chen, Chengjun Mao
Primary categorycs.CL
Published8 July 2026
Last updated at source5 September 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ed17656a-e801-4d13-8bb0-cb94ea86aee2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.