Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Geometric Collapse: When Vision Models Fail to Verify Physical Causality

Recent progress in large-scale self-supervised learning has improved dense geometric prediction, but it remains unclear whether such scaling yields inference-time physical plausibility checks. We propose Scrambled Edges, a controlled counterfactual that injects salient edge-like cues while violating surface continuity, illumination coherence, and occlusion ordering. With energy-matched and structure-matched controls, we isolate the effect of unsupported edge evidence from high-frequency energy and edge sparsity. Across CNN/ViT/SSL depth predictors on NYU Depth v2 and KITTI, Scrambled Edges induce up to 3.2x larger deviation from clean predictions than energy-matched noise; additional diff...

AuthorsWentao Zhang, Jinhu Qi, Weiqiang Jin et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published8 July 2026
Last updated at source8 July 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b3089b67-b71e-4677-8245-da6e7c392293" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.