Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Granularity Paradox: How Temporal Disaggregation Inflates In-Sample Fit and Compounds Out-of-Sample Error

This paper explores the "Granularity Paradox" in time-series forecasting, wherein finer temporal disaggregation (e.g., Monthly to Weekly/Daily) improves in-sample diagnostics and dataset size (N), but degrades out-of-sample accuracy due to recursive error compounding over longer horizons (H). Conversely, coarse aggregation (Annual) eliminates recursive error propagation but reduces data available to estimators. We formalize this trade-off and benchmark 10 models - spanning naïve, statistical, machine learning, and deep learning architectures - across six granularities using a 13-year public procurement dataset. The empirical results reveal a non-monotonic threshold structure: recursive au...

AuthorsHugo Moreira
Primary categorycs.LG
Published5 July 2026
Last updated at source5 July 2026
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ME
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fcc4abfa-02ae-4cad-9ac5-2db7ed52fadd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.