Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When AI Classifies: What Counts as Public Administration?

This study examines how alternative systems of scholarly representation identify and characterize broad public administration (PA) and artificial intelligence related public administration (AI-in-PA) scholarship. Using Web of Science and OpenAlex, it compares five approaches based on author-defined, citation-driven, and AI-assisted representations. The results highlight substantial differences in corpus size, publication types, publishing outlets, temporal development, and thematic clustering and structure. The alternative approaches often identify different knowledge domains instead of varied subsets of the same scholarship and therefore produce distinct representations, as evidenced by ...

AuthorsShaoming Cheng, Laurie Schintler
Primary categorycs.DL
Published26 June 2026
Last updated at source26 June 2026
cs.DLcs.AIcs.CYcs.DB
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/aec8caa2-c98d-4923-a05e-5df10f24a698" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.