Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

SPORK: Self-Speculative Forking to Accelerate Agentic LLM Inference

LLM agents are becoming a common interface for research, coding, and question answering, yet their Thought-Action-Observation loop is often serial: the model reasons, emits a tool call, then idles the GPU until the result returns. This wait consumes 16-37% of wall time in our workloads and 35-61% in prior reports. Speculative tool execution can hide this wait, but existing systems need auxiliary predictors, historical traces, or static workflow graphs, leaving a gap for training-free, day-one deployment. We observe that the model can be its own predictor: a probe forked at the start of generation predicts Qwen3-32B's upcoming tool name with 74.6-99.6% accuracy across five benchmarks. We p...

AuthorsHuajun Bai, Weiwei Lv, Huichuan Zheng et al.
Primary categorycs.DC
Published3 July 2026
Last updated at source3 July 2026
cs.DCcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/881be5dc-63fe-4024-8924-a028cda306f2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.