Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Not All Refusals Are Equal: How Safety Alignment Fails Cybersecurity at Scale

There is no doubt that safety alignment is an essential step in LLM training. However, conceptually it does not distinguish between various domains and the level of potential harm of a query, which creates significant complications in the fields like cyber security, where a model should not be constrained by its safety circuits to accomplish the goals of legitimate, authorized operations. In this work, we share our findings from a large scale abliteration experiment on 24 open-source LLMs and show that domain-specific abliteration is achievable with standard methodology on the example of a 1T-parameter Kimi K2. Building on recent work showing that refusal in LLMs occupies a multi-dimensio...

AuthorsVadym Hadetskyi, Dario Pasquini, Artem Sorokin
Primary categorycs.CR
Published2 July 2026
Last updated at source7 July 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8332f8ac-d1f0-473c-947e-45a155c2ff98" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.