Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Improving LLMs via Validator-to-Generator Alignment

Large language models are inconsistent: varying prompts or including unrelated information can lead to unexpected changes in model outputs. The generator-validator (G-V) gap is one manifestation of this phenomenon, where LLMs generate responses that they then deem as invalid if re-queried to validate them. In this work, we introduce a new formulation of G-V consistency that involves a principled correction for utterance frequency. Specifically, generators often assign low likelihood to valid strings simply because those strings are a priori unlikely, which makes naive notions of G-V consistency unworkable. We show that under a natural model of rational agents answering questions with mult...

AuthorsJuan Diego Rodriguez, Jocelyn Zhang, Katrin Erk et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published2 July 2026
Last updated at source2 July 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9994ae6b-612d-4f99-8bb9-1f71d42aa6e8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.