Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison

Quantum computing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm for machine learning (ML), with the potential to offer computational advantages over classical approaches. At this stage, the evidence supporting the performance and advantages of quantum machine learning (QML) models relative to classical models is insufficient. To address this gap, this paper presents an empirical study on the performance of QML models and their classical counterparts. We compare seven model pairs spanning supervised learning and reinforcement learning. Our results indicate that the evaluated quantum machine learning models do not yet surpass the classical baselines in overall prediction performance, po...

AuthorsChuanming Yu, Jiaming Liu, Zihao Ge et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published1 July 2026
Last updated at source2 July 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ae9ef153-901d-40e5-b3e4-746ab5144680" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.