Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Dual-Confidence Contrastive Decoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) increasingly requires models to answer questions from multiple retrieved documents, where only some sources are relevant and the retrieved bundle may contain stale, noisy, or conflicting evidence. Existing contrastive decoding methods primarily focus on resolving conflicts between the model's internal memory and the retrieved context. In contrast, we study the complementary problem of intra-context conflict in multi-document RAG. To evaluate this setting, we introduce DRQA, a factual-conflict question answering benchmark derived from enterprise deep-research scenarios, where answers are grounded in synthetic enterprise-specific facts that are designed ...

AuthorsRaymond Li, Md Tawkat Islam Khondaker, Amirhossein Abaskohi et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published1 July 2026
Last updated at source1 July 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/99ed69c7-c554-49bc-b295-16a17e9e153d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.