Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Sample Complexities of Estimating Gumbel--Max Watermark Proportions with and without Reduction to Pivotal Statistics

Watermarking promises statistical traceability of large language model (LLM) uses, but real documents rarely arrive as purely human-written or purely LLM-generated. This motivates a quantitative question beyond detection: what proportion of a document is generated from a pre-specified watermarked LLM? We study this watermark proportion estimation problem under the Gumbel--max watermarking mechanism, treating the next-token prediction distributions as unknown and arbitrary nuisance parameters subject to a non-degeneracy condition. We compare two observation regimes: in the full observation regime, the estimator observes the pseudorandom vector and the selected token at each position; in th...

AuthorsShuwen Chai, Qiaosen Wang
Primary categorymath.ST
Published30 June 2026
Last updated at source2 July 2026
math.STcs.ITcs.LGstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7ffd0fff-dcfb-4da7-90cc-ab955867c9b6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.