Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Why Advanced Encoders Lag on Sparse Retrieval? The Answer and an Approach to Bridging Vocabulary Gaps

While advanced foundation models like ModernBERT significantly outperform older architectures in dense retrieval, they surprisingly lag behind the aging BERT-base baseline in learned sparse retrieval (LSR). We identify the root cause as the \textit{Vocabulary Gap}: modern tokenizers utilize raw, case-sensitive vocabularies designed for lossless reconstruction, which map single semantic units to redundant surface forms, wasting model capacity on morphological noise and hindering lexical matching. We formalize this intuition through a theoretical framework, demonstrating that appropriate vocabulary coarse-graining can tighten the generalization bounds by reducing complexity of the hypothesi...

AuthorsZhichao Geng, Yang Yang
Primary categorycs.IR
Published20 April 2026
Last updated at source20 April 2026
cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a8e6bb51-6ff9-40ab-b0d7-978f075b5b52" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.