Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

From Accuracy to Visual Dependence: Auditing and Filtering Modality Collapse in Traffic VideoQA

High benchmark accuracy does not guarantee genuine use of visual evidence. We study this problem in traffic accident Video Question Answering (VideoQA), where correct answers should depend on scene-specific visual evidence but may instead be inferred from textual shortcuts. Through an audit of four public benchmarks, we find that several recent open-weight Vision-Language Models (VLMs) perform competitively, and sometimes better, without video input. On the MM-AU benchmark, removing video consistently improves accuracy, and adding more frames further degrades performance. To quantify visual dependence, we introduce two dataset-level diagnostics: Blind Gap, measuring above-chance text-only...

AuthorsSena Korkut, María Alejandra Bravo Sarmiento, Sanghwan Kim et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published29 June 2026
Last updated at source29 June 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d1d55cb1-900d-4f06-be0d-febaeefc1d9f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.